Jump to content
  • Announcements

    • AndalayBay

      Orphan Attachments   07/31/2018

      I have been doing some housekeeping lately and I've noticed that I had a lot of orphaned attachments. Attachments get orphaned when the PM or post is deleted without removing the attachment first. Deleting a PM or post does not delete the attachment and the file or image remain on the server. I'd like to ask all members to go through their attachments and delete any attachments you don't need anymore or those that have been orphaned. Where can I get a list of my attachments? Click on your display name in the upper right corner of the forums and pick "My Attachments" from the drop-down list. How can I tell an attachment is orphaned? If the PM has been deleted, you'll see a message like this in your attachment list: Unfortunately there is no message if the post has been deleted, so please check your old posts. We do purge old birthday threads every once in a while. Also some hosted projects have been shut down, so you may have orphaned attachments on one of those locations. Thanks!

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing most liked content since 09/14/2019 in Posts

  1. 1 point
    Your argument boils down to guilty until proven innocent. There are actual real-world examples of why this doesn't work, especially in cases like this. Presumption of innocence is fundamental to all modern English Common Law legal systems, which (the US and Canada are in the broadest sense these are still English Common Law systems) are founded on this principle. A principle largely established in the then-colony of New York. Clearly you don't understand what the ad hominem attack is. It means attacking the person's argument by attacking the person's character. It doesn't matter is Arthmoor is, shall we say, not the most diplomatic of people - all that matters is if he's right or not. If you are an intelligent person then it shouldn't matter how he expresses his argument so long as it's coherent. In this case pretty much his only contribution has been to protest against your damning Jeremy Soule as guilty based on one woman's testimony - because only one woman has actually accused him of an actual crime.
  2. 1 point
    Arthmoor

    Jeremy Soule Rape Accusations

    Expecting someone to follow proper due process of law, and to respect the Constitution, is not me pontificating a moral position. It's me being aghast at anyone with any level of education in the 1st world claiming that this man is guilty and needs to prove himself innocent of all charges. That's NOT how this shit works, ever. File charges, investigate the evidence, and take it to trial. That's ALL I'm expecting out of this woman. She clearly is not interested in doing this through the proper channels so she's turned to social media to exploit #metoo in her favor. It's disgusting and Soule should be filing a defamation suit against her instead. All you need to do to understand this position is to put yourself in the shoes of one being falsely accused. Suppose someone decided to go on Twitter and accuse you of stealing their social security check out of the mail. Suppose this person demands you be thrown in jail until you can prove you didn't steal it. How are you even supposed to prove your innocence in a situation like that? I'd genuinely love to know. This isn't 1592. The accused has rights. This woman is flagrantly violating his and there need to be consequences for it.
×