Arthmoor

That's why they posted the news article

https://www.nexusmods.com/news/14163

Hopefully this makes its way over to PC soon so I can actually give it a try. From everything I've seen it appears the mobile division is going all out with this game.

Also you could just get GoG versions of these. They'll more or less do all these steps behind the scenes.

Panda Security has been putting out a legit antivirus product for PC for years. They're not the most well known company but they're not driveby spammers either.

Murder, rape, and kidnapping I can understand, but good lord, you mean I could steal your car and get prosecuted for it 70 years later if I got caught?

Ok, 11 years ago in which state? Cause apparently the 50 states couldn't agree on the limitation so they all seem to have defined that on their own.

There's also one other thing that's not being considered. Statute of Limitations. We've seen plenty of examples of this already where someone trots out an accusation 30 years after the fact and expects the perpetrator to be charged. That's not going to happen obviously. So another important question to ask of this woman is exactly how long ago did this supposedly happen? Her 2 screeds on the subject don't make that at all clear, which I think was intentional on her part. Nevermind that she also filled both screeds with a lot of completely irrelevant information about the sales performance of her free games. I'd rather not have to entertain the more cynical theory my brain cooked up that she's doing this all to generate publicity. Cause you know, any publicity is good publicity?

Expecting someone to follow proper due process of law, and to respect the Constitution, is not me pontificating a moral position. It's me being aghast at anyone with any level of education in the 1st world claiming that this man is guilty and needs to prove himself innocent of all charges. That's NOT how this shit works, ever. File charges, investigate the evidence, and take it to trial. That's ALL I'm expecting out of this woman. She clearly is not interested in doing this through the proper channels so she's turned to social media to exploit #metoo in her favor. It's disgusting and Soule should be filing a defamation suit against her instead. All you need to do to understand this position is to put yourself in the shoes of one being falsely accused. Suppose someone decided to go on Twitter and accuse you of stealing their social security check out of the mail. Suppose this person demands you be thrown in jail until you can prove you didn't steal it. How are you even supposed to prove your innocence in a situation like that? I'd genuinely love to know. This isn't 1592. The accused has rights. This woman is flagrantly violating his and there need to be consequences for it.

Vincent, you should go back and look at the progression of this thread and seriously reevaluate just who resorted to personal attacks in all of this. As far as I'm concerned, this is a due process of law issue and an innocent until proven guilty issue. There have been no charges file and no verdict handed down by a jury. It's not right wing nonsense to expect these processes to be followed. The kind of justice you're asking for is barbarism, period.

So following due process of law and the Constitution is just a filthy right wing talking point now? Please do us all a favor and never run for office at any level. I'm not sure what it is they've taught people in school these days but this kind of thinking on your part is dangerous to us all. We fought an entire revolution against Great Britain over issues like this. We might not even exist as an independent nation today if they hadn't perpetrated exactly the kind of trial you're suggesting Soule be subject to. People lie. All the time. These women should not be assumed to be 100% truthful about any of this because they could very easily be lying about the whole thing. It happens far more than most lefties are willing to admit. This exact sort of thing is why I do not believe we should even be allowed to discuss someone being accused, arrested, jailed, or in any way deprived of their rights without it having gone to trial and a conviction handed down by the jury.

To the satisfaction of a court of law? Eyewitness testimony, DNA, rape kits, other physical evidence, a proper police investigation, and so on. To the satisfaction of the court of public opinion? With an unsubstantiated accusation on an obscure blog apparently. And this right here is exactly backward to how proper justice works. This simply is NOT acceptable in any civilized nation ever. Unless you've got the secret for how to prove a negative this kind of thinking belongs in a kangaroo court.

If these people are only whining on their blogs about it, absolutely nobody should lend it any credibility at all. Back your shit up with proper evidence. File charges. Let the cops and/or the DA deal with it properly. Otherwise all I see is two angry girls trying to ruin this guy's life for no reason.

Exactly my point though. It's just her word against his, and I'm not just gonna blindly believe her because she's a woman. That's not how proper justice works.

I was raised with the rule that you don't go around accusing people of crimes if you have no evidence of a crime. The fact that no official charges have been filed would seem to suggest there's no evidence for any of this and it's just vindictive individuals trying to ruin his life for some reason.